<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 30 May 2012 23:06:11 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Home</title><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:59:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Wake Up and Smell the Options! Top Ten Alternatives to Litigation</title><dc:creator>Sandra J. Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:49:52 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/2012/3/15/wake-up-and-smell-the-options-top-ten-alternatives-to-litiga.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">884354:10341512:15448140</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="padding-top:15px;" src="http://www.technologyadr.com/storage/adr.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1331837811086" alt="" /></span></span>Litigation is a constant source of fear in the corporate world. It can be a no-win vacuum of corporate energy, time, money, and even secrets! CEO&rsquo;s, CFO&rsquo;s and In-House Counsel strive to find a way to manage the risk of litigation and the reality of litigation if they actually face a lawsuit.<br />
How can you avoid litigation? What options do you have once you&rsquo;re faced with litigation?</p>
<p><a href="http://acc.com/legalresources/publications/topten/wuastottatl.cfm" target="_blank">Click to read more...</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/rss-comments-entry-15448140.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Questions and Answers with Sandra J. Franklin</title><category>Med-Arb</category><category>Michigan Information Technology Lawyer</category><category>technology arbitration</category><category>technology lawyer</category><category>technology mediation</category><dc:creator>Sandra J. Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:26:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/2011/12/9/questions-and-answers-with-sandra-j-franklin.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">884354:10341512:14048730</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/33431426?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="440" height="330" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/rss-comments-entry-14048730.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CHECKLIST</title><category>Copyright protection</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Intellectual Property Audit</category><category>Intellectual Property Examples</category><category>Invention</category><category>Nondisclosure Agreement</category><category>Patents</category><category>Trade Secrets</category><category>Trademark(s)</category><dc:creator>Sandra J. Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:12:07 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/2011/10/20/intellectual-property-checklist.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">884354:10341512:13390672</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.technologyadr.com/storage/blogbuttons/IP.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1319122240675" alt="" /></span></span>CHECK ON YOUR TRADEMARKS, TRADE SECRETS, PATENTS AND COPYRIGHTS!</em></strong><strong><em>&nbsp;</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>CHECK ON YOUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICIES AND <br />PROCEDURES as well as YOUR EXTERNAL RELATIONS!</em></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1>Trademarks</h1>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>1. &nbsp;Importance to company&rsquo;s business objectives identified.</p>
<p>2. &nbsp;Measures for selecting trademarks/domain names for new products, services?</p>
<p>3. &nbsp;Measures for assuring consistent proper use &ndash; on products, services, advertising?</p>
<p>4. &nbsp;Measures for assuring timely registration, renewal, amendment of registration to comply with changes made?</p>
<p>5. &nbsp;Possible infringement by third parties?</p>
<p>6. &nbsp;Licensing opportunities.</p>
<p>7. &nbsp;Relationship to Domain Names.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1>Trade Secrets</h1>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/rss-comments-entry-13390672.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Do You Need an Intellectual Property Consultant?</title><category>Copyright protection</category><category>Do you need an Intellectual Property Consultant</category><category>IP Consultant</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Intellectual Property Examples</category><dc:creator>Sandra J. Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:21:31 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/2011/9/19/do-you-need-an-intellectual-property-consultant.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">884354:10341512:12918448</guid><description><![CDATA[<span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.technologyadr.com/storage/blogbuttons/IP.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1316471193561" alt=""/></span></span><p>You need an Intellectual Property consultant whenever you are thinking about entering the marketplace with a new idea.  If you’re starting a new business, you need to consider whether the name you want to use is already being used, if an associated domain name is available, if the name is protectible as a trademark, and how you want to portray your image.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/rss-comments-entry-12918448.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Protect Your Intellectual Property</title><category>Copyrights</category><category>Patents</category><category>Trademarks</category><category>What does Pat Pend mean</category><category>What does the abbreviation TM stand for</category><category>What is a trademark</category><category>how to protect intellectual property</category><category>trademark lawyer</category><dc:creator>Sandra J. Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:56:27 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/2011/9/16/protect-your-intellectual-property.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">884354:10341512:12885018</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>As seen in the SCORE column in the <a title="Link to Article" href="http://record-eagle.com/business/x151681026/Sandy-Franklin-Protect-intellectual-property" target="_blank">Record Eagle</a> newspaper - Author: Sandra J. Franklin</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.technologyadr.com/storage/blogbuttons/IP.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1316549305078" alt="" /></span></span>What do abbreviations such as TM, SM, PAT PEND, &copy;, &reg; actually mean?&nbsp; These symbols represent trademarks, patents, and copyrights that provide certain legal rights and protections to their owner. They help safeguard a company&rsquo;s names, products, services, and designs. As an entrepreneur, you should determine if you need to pursue any of these options to ensure you properly protect what is referred to as the intellectual property of your small business.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/rss-comments-entry-12885018.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Differences Between a Mediation and an Arbitration</title><category>Alternative Dispute Resolution</category><category>Arbitration</category><category>Mediation</category><category>What is Mediation</category><category>arbitration hearing</category><category>arbitrator</category><category>arbitrator for intellectual property disputes</category><category>mediation process</category><category>mediator</category><category>mediator for technology companies</category><category>what is arbitration</category><dc:creator>Sandra J. Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:35:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/2011/8/25/the-differences-between-a-mediation-and-an-arbitration.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">884354:10341512:12624975</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe width="560" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/IWMN0Bn7wc8?rel=0&amp;hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/rss-comments-entry-12624975.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>ADR in the Pharmaceutical Industry</title><category>Alternative Dispute Resolution</category><category>Arbitration</category><category>Disclosure</category><category>Hearing</category><category>IP</category><category>Intellectual Property</category><category>Intellectual Property Rights</category><category>Litigation</category><category>Mediation</category><category>Pharmaceutical</category><category>Technology Development</category><category>patent infringement</category><dc:creator>Sandra J. Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:31:39 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/2011/7/7/adr-in-the-pharmaceutical-industry.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">884354:10341512:12034744</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="float: left; padding-bottom: 7px;"src="http://www.technologyadr.com/storage/pat.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1310050994546" alt=""/></span></span>Competition is heavy in the Pharmaceutical arena, with billions of dollars at stake.  Pharmaceutical companies fight for a higher share of the market through marketing campaigns, competition for employees, regulatory struggles, and research and development (R&amp;D) programs, to name a few battlegrounds.  In the latter, the R&amp;D field, pharmaceutical companies are racing to be the first to develop solid Intellectual Property rights in the next best application of breakthrough technology.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/rss-comments-entry-12034744.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Intellectual Property Example One - Patents</title><category>Assignment for Intellectual Property</category><category>Employment Agreement</category><category>Intellectual Property Examples</category><category>Intellectual Property Rights</category><category>Invention</category><category>Inventor</category><category>Patent(s)</category><category>R &amp; D</category><category>Research and Development</category><dc:creator>Sandra J. Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:22:15 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/2011/5/17/intellectual-property-example-one-patents.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">884354:10341512:11487134</guid><description><![CDATA[<img style="float: left;" src="storage/pat.png" alt="" />An Employee of a Research and Development (R&amp;D) company worked on a new way to manufacture a widget produced by the company.  The company did not ask Employee to do this; Employee just wanted to get a problem solved.  The company did not have R&amp;D funding set aside for this particular problem, so Employee worked on solving the manufacturing problem in his spare time, sometimes even working on it at home.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/rss-comments-entry-11487134.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Intellectual Property Example Two – Trademarks</title><category>Commercial Use</category><category>Intellectual Property Rights</category><category>Trademark(s)</category><category>USPTO</category><dc:creator>Sandra J. Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:20:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/2011/5/17/intellectual-property-example-two-trademarks.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">884354:10341512:11487125</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="float: left; margin-bottom: 6px;" src="../../storage/tm.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1305833624893" alt=""/></span></span>A Woman has been producing and selling bread locally under the name Mother’s Bread for twenty years.  She has not filed an application for a trademark registration with the state or with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).  A national baking company suddenly sells bread named Mother’s Bread in the same stores as the Woman, right next to the original Mother’s Bread.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyadr.com/home/rss-comments-entry-11487125.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
